© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The headquarters for Axon Enterprise Inc is seen in Scottsdale, Arizona

By Stephen Nellis

(Reuters) – Axon Enterprise Inc (O:) on Friday sued the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in a bid to have potential antitrust litigation heard in a federal district court and not in an internal FTC process, which it alleges is biased toward regulators.

Axon, the manufacturer of Taser stun guns and body camera systems for police departments, has been the target of FTC scrutiny since 2018, when the regulator requested information from the Arizona-based company about its acquisition of Vievu.

Vievu was a smaller player in the market for body cameras and online storage and management of the footage they generate.

In the complaint filed on Friday in U.S. district court in Arizona, Axon said it complied with regulators’ requests for 18 months at a cost of $1.5 million in legal fees.

Last month, Axon alleges, FTC officials told the company it would have to unwind its Vievu acquisition by divesting the assets and offering patent licenses to any potential acquirer.

Axon alleged that in a December 2019 face-to-face meeting with its attorney, the FTC threatened to start an internal administrative law proceeding this month to unwind the Vievu deal if Axon would not agree to the settlement.

An FTC spokeswoman did not immediately return a request for comment Friday.

In its filing, Axon denied the deal was anticompetitive.

“No one should ever face the prospect of a government that can demand to seize your most precious assets without the ability to defend yourself in a fair and impartial court of law,” Rick Smith, chief executive of Axon, said in a press statement made after the suit was filed. “If the FTC believes it has a strong case against us, it should prove it in federal court before a neutral judge.”

The FTC can choose to file antitrust actions either in federal district courts as a lawsuit or pursue them in an internal administrative law procedure.

Axon alleges that FTC’s internal administrative proceedings are unfair because they can only be appealed to the full FTC commission, which Axon argued has sided with administrative law judges 100% of the time in the past two decades.

While an FTC decision can then be appealed to federal appeals court, no new facts or evidence can be introduced, making it harder to overturn the case, Axon argued.

Axon is also asking a federal judge to declare the FTC’s administrative law process unconstitutional because it can take away a company’s intellectual property without a hearing before a neutral judge.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Source link